Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
There are two complementary funding programs for the Syrian humanitarian crisis, namely:
o The Syrian Humanitarian Response Plan (for work within Syria), with a FY 2016 budget totalling USD 3.2 billion
o Syrian Regional Refugee & Resilience Plan (3RP), supporting refugees in neighbouring countries – FY 2016 budget totalling USD 4.5 billion. .
See the UN’s Financial Tracking Service (FTS) for the latest funding for each https://fts.unocha.org/pageloader.aspx?page=special-syriancrisis
What are the latest funding commitments for each of these two appeals, and discuss with here in the forum why there might be such a shortfall in each?
Overall funding shortfall in Syria is 41%, with SHRP at 33% & 3RP at 47%.
Reasons may be many including:
– donors not wanting to commit to ongoing funding after losing the ‘urgency’ of the mission,
-donors waiting for next crisis,
-crisis needs changing with time.
It’s interesting that this was not explained in the UNOCHA summary.
It’ll be interesting to see whether funding commitments increase should the latest ‘peace agreement; hold (mid-Sept 2016)
It’ll be interesting to see whether funding commitments increase should the latest ‘peace agreement; hold (mid-Sept 2016)
It’ll be interesting to see whether funding commitments increase should the latest ‘peace agreement; hold (mid-Sept 2016)
It’ll be interesting to see whether funding commitments increase should the latest ‘peace agreement; hold (mid-Sept 2016)
It’ll be interesting to see whether funding commitments increase should the latest ‘peace agreement; hold (mid-Sept 2016)